Enhancing Teachers’ Understanding of Classroom Action Research Through A School University Partnership: A One-Group Pretest–Posttest Study at SMP Islam At-Taubah, East Jakarta

Penulis

  • R. Madhakomala Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eliana Sari Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Satri Dwi Kurnia Nasution Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Business, and Social Sciences, Universitas Sunan Gresik, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7090-7122
  • Fawzul Arifin Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sisca Cletus Lamatokan Early Childhood Education (PAUD), Graduate Studies, Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi, Indonesia
  • S. Nudia Mastur Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • UU Abdullah Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54082/jippm.1464

Kata Kunci:

Classroom Action Research, Community Engagement, Normalised Gain, School–University Partnership, Teacher Professional Development

Abstrak

This community service research project aimed to improve teachers’ understanding and initial skills in developing Classroom Action Research (PTK) proposals through a one-day training and mentoring session conducted by a university team at At-Taubah Islamic Junior High School in East Jakarta. The evaluation used a single-group pretest–posttest design. A total of 32 elementary and junior high school teachers participated in the activity, while 27 participants with complete and comparable pretest and posttest data were analyzed. Understanding of CAT was measured using a 16-item multiple-choice test administered via an online form. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, the Wilcoxon test as a robustness check, Cohen’s dz, and normalized gain. The mean score increased significantly from 88.66 to 96.05 on a scale of 0–100 (t(26) = 4.878; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (dz = 0.94) and a moderate normalized gain (g = 0.65). The greatest improvement occurred in understanding the sequence of the PTK cycle, specifically from 53.3% to 89.7% correct answers. In addition to improved understanding, this activity resulted in initial drafts of PTK proposals developed in groups based on real-world problems in their respective classrooms. Participatory training combined with guidance on proposal drafting had an initial impact on the partners in the form of increased teacher understanding of the PTK procedures and their ability to formulate problems and draft initial PTK proposals. Continued guidance is still needed to ensure that the teachers’ understanding and proposal drafts

Referensi

Abidin, Z., Arifudin, R., & Sugiharti, E. (2025). Pendampingan Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan bagi Guru di Yayasan Waqah Al Hidayah, Hatyai, Provinsi Songkhla, Thailand. Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 5(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.54082/jippm.758

Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). Teaching Research to Teachers—Traversing from Research-Oriented Education to Research Learning Theory. In N. J. Al-Thani & Z. Ahmad, Teaching and Learning with Research Cognitive Theory (pp. 97–112). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87544-1_6

Brydges, C. R. (2019). Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), igz036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036

Cortes, S. T., Lorca, A. S., Pineda, H. A., & Lobrigas, M. R. S. (2025). Does training improve the action research skills of STEM teachers? Examining the mediating roles of attitude and knowledge. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101231

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Francisco, S., Forssten Seiser, A., & Olin Almqvist, A. (2024). Action research as professional learning in and through practice. Professional Development in Education, 50(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2338445

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2026). Action research as a pathway to teacher leadership: Constructing professional identity from within. Educational Action Research, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2026.2655301

Goodman, B., Nam, A., Yembergenova, A., Nuta, O., & Malone, K. (2025). ‘I should conduct action research more often’: Teacher educators’ professional development through action research. Educational Action Research, 33(3), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2025.2468958

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Johannesson, P. (2022). Development of professional learning communities through action research: Understanding professional learning in practice. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100

Lynch, D., Vo, H., Yeigh, T., Marcoionni, T., Madden, J., & Turner, D. (2025). Action research communities as a whole-of-school teaching improvement initiative: A multi-method multi-informant study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(2), 1133–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00756-7

Negi, J. S. (2026). Teacher-led action research for transformative change in low-resource classrooms in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 124, 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103602

Nurhaliza, R., Harsono, A. M. B., & Suriansyah, A. (2026). Transforming the Role of Teachers from Educators to Educational Content Creators in the Digital Era. Elementary Education: Journal of Studies, Analysis, and Development, 1(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.64850/elementary.v1i1.208

Santagata, R., Kimmerling, C., Fuentes Acevedo, P., & Liu, J. (2026). Conducting research on teacher professional development in partnership with educators: Promises, tensions and opportunities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 58(2), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2392600

Stavermann, K. (2025). Online Teacher Professional Development: A Research Synthesis on Effectiveness and Evaluation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9

Syaridawati, Ondeng, S., & Mustami, K. (2025). Improving Teacher Professionalism Through Classroom Action Research to Achieve Better National Education Quality. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(4), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i4.980

Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in-service STEM teachers’ self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x

Diterbitkan

04-09-2026

Cara Mengutip

Madhakomala, R., Sari, E., Nasution, S. D. K., Arifin, F., Lamatokan, S. C. ., Mastur, S. N. ., & Abdullah, U. . (2026). Enhancing Teachers’ Understanding of Classroom Action Research Through A School University Partnership: A One-Group Pretest–Posttest Study at SMP Islam At-Taubah, East Jakarta. Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 6(2), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.54082/jippm.1464